Wednesday, December 22, 2010

A GIANT Dissapointment

EAST RUTHERFORD, NJ - DECEMBER 19: Jeremy Macl...Image by Getty Images via @daylife I know it happened more than 3 days ago, but it took this long for me to talk about this rationally. The New York Giants lost their game against the division rival Philadelphia Eagles after leading by 21 points with only 8 minutes to play. For the last few days I have listened to commentators talk about whether the Giants lost or the Eagles won. This question is absurd. Anyone that watched the game knows that the Giants lost the game because of stupid and very costly mental errors. I can think of at least six unbelievable mistakes that cost the giants the game.

The first was the fumble by Mario Manningham. While being tackled going out of bounds, Manningham was holding the ball away from his body and somehow fumbled the ball back into the field of play with the Eagles recovering the ball. The Eagles would go on to score their first TD of the game. Why wasn't the ball secured during the tackle? Hakeem Nicks did the same thing in the first half on a tackle near the sidelines without fumbling, but the danger is the same. Tuck the ball away when you are getting hit. There is no reason to be careless just because you are close to a sideline.

Second, what was Kenny Phillips thinking on the touchdown pass to the tight end running down the middle of the field? The Giants were in some kind of 3 deep coverage with Justin Tuck taking away the short pass in the middle of the field and Phillips taking away the deep middle. Phillips properly breaks on the ball when Vick releases it, but while the ball is in the air Phillips has a brain fart. He decides to go for the passive interception while ignoring a wide open receiver in his zone. By the time he realized the receiver was going to make the catch it was too late for him to change his angle to make the tackle. Why are you playing for a pick in this situation and if you’re going to do that why not go after the ball instead of waiting for it to drop in your hands? Your job is to stop the deep pass from being completed. This means you have to keep the receiver from catching the ball in your zone. You didn't even know he was there!

I hate that he is third, but Terrell Thomas had one of the worst plays of the game on the touchdown pass that he allowed. Thomas was lined up in man coverage and was playing off of the wide receiver by about 7 to 10 yards when the Eagles 15 to 20 yards from the end zone. There is no reason for such a large cushion in this situation. Any inside move is a completion, any quick throw is a completion with an opportunity for the receiver to run after the catch, and you have no chance of making the receiver deviate from his route. The receiver runs a hitch route for about 7 or 10 yards, Thomas breaks on the receiver when the ball is thrown and closes quickly enough to make a tackle but didn't. He didn't make the tackle because even though the receiver was only a few feet from the sideline, Thomas drove to the outside half of the receiver. The receiver spins to the inside and scores easily. What would posses you to play the receiver to the outside when you can take away the inside and still force him out of bounds? Why give him the option of coming back inside where you have no help? What was the thought process here?

I'm not going to spend much time on number 4. I was on the kick return team for all 9 years that I played football. Rule number one on the front line of this team: Make sure the ball is kicked before you turn and run. Rule number two: Never turn your back to the ball. Enough said.

Mistake number 5 happens across 3 plays on the same drive. When you are blitzing a running quarterback you have to stay disciplined and hold your gaps. Aaron Ross forgot about that when he rushed from the outside and instead of squeezing the pocket he cut inside of the tackle giving up contain and allowing Vick to run for 30 plus yards. Later in the drive the pocket is being squeezed with the blitz but no one is in the middle to keep Vick from stepping up and running so he does just that. Antrel Rolle had a free run at Vick and instead of getting low and running threw his hip; Rolle tries to tackle Vick around his shoulders. This allows Vick to take a half step to the side and duck out of the way. You have to know the situation and what you are supposed to do. Blitzing is a lot less risky when you play your responsibility and make tackles.

Finally, kicking the ball to Jackson was stupid; really, really stupid. Matt Dodge knew that and tried to kick the ball out of bounds. He received a high snap which got him off rhythm and he missed the kick. The game never should have come down to a punt return so and honestly this kid has taken enough punishment from everyone else so I'll leave him alone.

The Giants had the division, a guaranteed playoff berth, and the second seed in the playoffs in their grasp and gave all of it to the Eagles. I am still in utter shock that these mistakes took place and cost the Giants a game. This was the worst loss that I have ever witnessed and the players have to find a way to make good for the rest of the season or they will lose out on the playoffs and probably lose their head coach.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Stop Talking About Tebow Playing This Year

DENVER - OCTOBER 24:  Quarterback Tim Tebow #1...Image by Getty Images via @daylife I wish that most of the fans here in Denver had some kind of football background. Then they could start making comments that make sense or at least have some kind of legitimacy to them. I keep hearing about how Kyle Orton is terrible and that Tim Tebow is the saving grace of the Denver Broncos. There are 2 reasons why I have an issue with this.

First off, Kyle Orton is a very good QB. He's not great but he is a very smart guy who has proven time and time again that he can run the offense and that he is a winner. This guy spent a few years backing up one of the worst starting QB's in league history because the coaching staff in Chicago couldn't look past his physical attributes. The QB position in the NFL isn't all about physical capability. It is mostly about knowing your capabilities and playing within them. Orton knows his limits, what he does well, and what he can't do. Every week he prepares so that he puts himself in a position to be successful and for the most part he has been. You can't look at the record here in Denver and put that on Orton. The defense has been terrible for years and other than the last 2 weeks Orton has played solid ball.

Reason number 2 has to do with knowing limitations of play and what the fans aren't seeing. Tim Tebow throws a football like it were a baseball. Some may say that, well a MLB pitcher can throw 100 mile an hour fastball so what is the big deal. These people don't know football. a football is meant to be thrown from the ear not the hip. This allows for the QB to make his decision as to where to throw the ball and get it out of his hands very quickly. Tebow has a very long throwing motion because he drops the ball to his hip before he brings it to his ear and then releases it. He has worked very hard to convince people that the motion is changing and that he can play at the next level, but so far he hasn't changed anything. Why is a slow release so terrible. I'll tell you.

There are 3 plays that are huge momentum shifters for a defense: the sack, the fumble, and the interception. A QB with Tebows throwing motion is more apt to be plagued by all three. By taking more time to get the ball out of his hands Tebow allows the defense more time to collapse the pocket and get to him for a sack. By dropping the ball to his hip to begin his throwing motion he leaves the ball unprotected for a longer amount of time compared to most QB's in the league. This allows pass rushers a greater opportunity to knock the ball out of his throwing hand and even puts the ball in an easier place for it to get stripped. Defensive backs and linebackers all read the QB during a pass play. Since it takes Tebow so long to release the ball after he makes up his mind where to throw it, it gives the defense a better opportunity to break on the ball and either break up the play or get the intervention. Did anyone else notice what happened on Tebows 1 TD pass? his receiver was running a flat route and was wide open. Tebow's throwing motion almost made this an incomplete pass or a one yard gain short of the endzone. The ball was thrown short of the goaline and the receiver struggled to make it into the endzone for the score.

I've seen the video Tebow did with Coach Gruden over the summer in which they both said that the progress he has made is remarkable. I was not that impressed. Tebow's delivery was still slow because he was focusing so hard on form that it took a while for him to get the ball out of his hands. When I watched him in preseason games his first throws of a game where good and then it was back to the same old throwing motion. He hasn't been allowed to throw a ball during the regular season because of this. He needs more time to make the right throwing motion for the pros his natural throwing motion. Until this happens he can be a good quarterback in the league, but like Byron Leftwich it won't last very long.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, December 3, 2010

5 Things the BCS Should Know About Their 5 Things We Should Know

The BCS unveiled their new logo for the 2010-1...Image via Wikipedia
BCS Logo 2006-2010. An alternate version of th..." src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/2e/Bowl_Championship_Series_2006-2010_logo.png" width=250 height=224>
ESPN the Magazine ran an article in their Dec 13 edition called 5 Things You Should Know About The BCS and Why it Does Not Need Fixing, No Matter What Anyone Says. I'll go over point by point why Bill Hancock, executive director of the BCS, is an idiot and why the system needs tweaking.

1. Hancock says that there is nothing to fix. He says that you can't please everyone and no matter what system is in place people will have issues with it. He goes on to say that before the BCS the #1 and #2 teams in the country were not guaranteed to play for the title and now the title game is one of the most watched out of all sports. Just because the BCS is better than a poll for for deciding a champion doesn't mean that it doesn't need tweaking. Boise State has lost one game in 3 regular seasons and has yet to play for a national title they were ranked 4th before their this week and had no chance of competing for the title even if they went undefeated again. Boise State dropped to 11th behind three 2 loss teams. I just heard From Kirk Herbstreet that if Auburn losses in their SEC Championship game this weekend then TCU, undefeated, could be left out of the National Championship game. Are you sure that there is nothing to fix Mr. Hancock?

2. Hancock says that facts aren't always straight. He says that 11 conferences voluntarily participate in the BCS and Have the option of leaving when the contract is up. I find it funny that he uses the word participates because it feels like there are maybe 5 confrences that have any pull in the system. The SEC has the most since like I said earlier, it is still possible for Auburn to go to the National Championship game even if they loose tomorrow. Boise's and TCU's confrences obviously are on the outside looking in. Those are the facts and they are pretty straight forward.

3. Money isn't everything but it is something Hancock says. I really think that this is something none of us should have ever learned about the BCS. A team that earns an automatic qualifying bid to a BCS game earns $24 million for their confrence. A non automatic qualifying school that scraps it's way to a BCS game earns $6 million. Why is it that a team that makes it to the same bowls as all the other BCS teams makes $18 million less? What is that about? So far I have learned that no AQ teams that go undefeated can't play for National Championships and they can't make the same money that the AQ teams can. Glad to know that they are equal participants in your BCS system Mr. Hancock.

4. Hancock has the gaul to say that "We embrace the little guy. Really". He basically says that it is the confrence commissioners fault that Boise State and TCU can go undefeated and still not play for a National Championship. He doesn't say why they can't make the same as everyone else for making it to a BCS bowl game, but I guess it is because he wants to see them fight and scrap for respect and money. Just keep showing them the love.

5. To know us is to love us. The BCS is happy to talk with senators and the president. Really, that's who you think you need to explain this stuff to. I don't the legislater involved in sports in anyway shape or form and especially not amature sports. Besides, they have more important things to be talking about. Explain to me how many undefeated seasons it takes to prove you are worthy of a title shot. Explain to me how a team can improve their strength of schedule when top teams refuse to play them because they are too good. Explain to me how you can honestly crown a champion without at least a 4 team playoff.

The BCS is better than what was there before but it is still not what the fans want or what the teams deserve. All teams deserve a shot, especially if you run the table. the only fair thing to do is have a play off. 8 teams at most would add one extra week to the already 2 week bowl schedule.


Enhanced by Zemanta